Upload the client's spec and CodeReviewer scores every pull request against it: what's done, what's half-done and what everyone forgot. So "are we finished?" gets answered before the demo, not during it.
A requirement buried on page six of the spec never made it into a ticket, and the client is the one who notices.
Different developers, different habits. Review depth depends on who had time that week.
The client asks what was tested. The honest answer is "we clicked around before the release".
Requirements are split into must, should and may, and each pull request is matched to the ones it delivers. With evidence you can show the client.
Every client project gets the same whole-codebase review, the same verified fixes and the same test coverage, regardless of who wrote the code.
Each client lives in its own project with its own repositories, spec and members, and you choose exactly what each member can do.
Export the test-case catalog to Excel, share a consolidated security report, and show the requirement-by-requirement evidence of what shipped.
Agencies are judged on what they said they would deliver. CodeReviewer makes that measurable: the spec becomes a checklist, each pull request becomes evidence against it, and gaps show up while there is still time to close them.
Senior reviewers can’t be on every account. CodeReviewer gives every pull request, on every client project, the same careful first review, backed by the same verified fixes and tests.
Upload the spec for a feature or a client project. CodeReviewer breaks it into requirements, checks every pull request against them, and keeps a live scorecard with evidence for each one.
→ai code reviewEvery pull request gets a senior-level review within minutes. CodeReviewer reads your repo as it'll look after the change. It only comments where it can show you why.
→test automationPoint CodeReviewer at part of your app. It reads the code to learn what the feature should do, clicks through it like a user, and records real end-to-end tests. Authoring uses AI once; every replay after that is free.
→security testingGet a security grade without sending any attack traffic. Run active, pentest-style scans on domains you've verified. Get a threat model built from your own code. Then turn each finding into a fix.
→team & governanceCodeReviewer can merge code, apply fixes and scan your infrastructure. So admins decide who can do what, on which project, and which domains can be actively tested.
→issues & featuresA built-in tracker that understands your codebase. Reported bugs are checked against the code and traced to the line; feature requests become implementation plans you can revise, lock and hand to AI to build.
→Markdown. Paste or upload the spec and CodeReviewer splits it into individual requirements for you to review.
Yes. Invite them as members of their own project only, with fine-grained permissions. For example, they can see the scorecard and issues but can't merge or trigger runs.
Pricing is per developer, not per client project, and allowances are pooled across your workspace. Talk to us about agency terms if you run many projects.
Passive scans work on any URL. Active scans require proving you control the domain, so you'll need the client to add a DNS record or a verification file.
Start your 15-day free trial. We onboard a few teams every week.
