for engineering teams

Merge sooner, without lowering the bar.

CodeReviewer takes the first pass on every pull request. It reads the whole codebase, fixes what it safely can and backs it up with tests. Your senior engineers get to review design, not typos.

Start free trialTalk to sales
Add invoice export+214 −38
reviewed in 3m · read 1,204 files · 3 findings
money/format.ts:87bug · major

Divides by 100 where the other 14 money paths count in cents. Totals drift on thirds.

api/export.ts:41security

Export ignores the caller's workspace. Any signed-in user could pull another tenant's invoices.

sound familiar?

What slows you down today.

Pull requests wait for a reviewer

Work sits for hours for a first look, the author context-switches away, and small changes turn into day-long round trips.

Reviews only see the diff

The caller two files away. The second code path that formats the same data differently. Nobody re-reads those, and that's where regressions come from.

Seniors are the bottleneck

Your most experienced engineers spend their afternoons catching null checks and naming slips instead of shaping the architecture.

with codereviewer

What changes.

A first review in minutes

Every pull request is reviewed as soon as it opens, with findings pinned to real lines and ranked by severity.

Fixes that arrive checked

Safe fixes are written, type-checked and committed to the branch. If a fix won't work, it goes back to a person with the reason. It never loops.

Clean changes merge themselves

Set the rules (no findings above minor, tests passing, matches the spec) and routine pull requests get approved and merged for you.

Conventions that stick

A small config file in the repo teaches CodeReviewer your house rules, and the patterns your team keeps dismissing are surfaced so they can be tuned out.

A reviewer that has read everything

Most review tools look at the lines you changed. CodeReviewer builds the repo as it’ll look after the merge and follows the change outward, into the callers, data paths and tests it touches. Every comment comes with the evidence, so accepting or rejecting it takes seconds.

Keep humans where they matter

Nothing merges without meeting the rules your team sets, and any finding can be dismissed with one click. CodeReviewer takes the repetitive first pass so your reviewers can spend their attention on design, trade-offs and product decisions.

the toolkit

Built for how you work.

ai code review

AI code review

Every pull request gets a senior-level review within minutes. CodeReviewer reads your repo as it'll look after the change. It only comments where it can show you why.

autofix

Autofix

A finding is only half the job. CodeReviewer writes the fix, type-checks it, builds it and commits it to the pull request. Do one finding, all of them, or give it your own instructions.

auto-merge

Auto-merge

When a change has a clean review, passing tests and matches the spec, there's nothing left for a person to decide. CodeReviewer approves and merges it (squash, merge or rebase). If people disagree, it steps aside.

test automation

Test automation

Point CodeReviewer at part of your app. It reads the code to learn what the feature should do, clicks through it like a user, and records real end-to-end tests. Authoring uses AI once; every replay after that is free.

spec tracking

Spec tracking

Upload the spec for a feature or a client project. CodeReviewer breaks it into requirements, checks every pull request against them, and keeps a live scorecard with evidence for each one.

performance

Performance

Most speed tools only measure your public homepage. CodeReviewer replays your signed-in flows under throttling, measures Core Web Vitals on the real pages, and alerts you the moment a change blows a budget.

faq

Questions, answered.

Will it slow our CI down?

No. CodeReviewer runs alongside your pipeline, not inside it. It reviews and comments on the pull request in parallel with your existing checks.

Can we control what gets merged automatically?

Yes. Auto-merge is off until you turn it on per repository, and you choose the conditions and the merge style: squash, merge or rebase. It also backs off whenever a person disputes one of its findings.

Does it work with our monorepo?

Yes. CodeReviewer reads the repository as a whole, and the config file lets you set build steps and ignore paths per project.

Which Git host do you support?

GitHub today, installed as a GitHub App in a few clicks.

Give every PR the review it deserves.

Start your 15-day free trial. We onboard a few teams every week.